Data Disruption in Design and Construction Leveraging Data Could Be the Push Construction Needs to Move Forward

For some individuals with old machines, the ROI was less than 60 days. The new machines increased production time for our detailers and added capacity within the detailing department (which is always strained for resources).

Before adopting a structured data approach, the only evidence we had as to how well our machines were performing was anecdotal (mostly complaints). This led to some individuals being perceived as higher maintenance when, in reality, their machines were just significantly slower. And some individuals who did not complain also had slow machines, but took no issue with waiting for drawings to load. The lack of data — namely not knowing which detailers were using slow machines — was hiding a drag on productivity.

Where Construction Needs Data the Most

Cost accounting and historical performance metrics have enormous potential for the data analysis space. Historically, construction companies have only had access to financial data that was structured in a way that allowed a data scientist to build and analyze trends. Building historical databases that are dynamic enough to account for the complexity of today’s projects and tied to the BIM could provide huge insight into forecasting future project costs.

Now that we know where data is most needed, let’s look at obstacles to leveraging data as well as what (or who) is needed to overcome them.

To start, “data scientists” needs to be new players on design and construction teams. Data science is about removing emotion, heuristics, and cognitive biases from high-stakes decision making that are inherent in our industry (and all industries, for that matter). It allows personnel to make more informed decisions and focus on more interesting complex problem solving.

As structured data collection and retention expands in the industry, data scientists will be paramount in driving more informed decision making – both on a micro (project-level) and macro (business-wide) level. Early findings from our relatively limited utilization of data science methodology has yielded new, previously unseen correlations between data points that can help predict and mitigate risk earlier than we previously imagined.

A significant challenge for construction industry players seeking to justify the expense of retaining data scientists is the lack of structured data at scale. Technology companies, with large margins and capital to deploy, can offer more attractive compensation for in-demand data scientists. Also, these companies are more foundationally built on structured data collection and management, thereby making them better equipped to realize ROI from data scientists.

Where to Start Now

Software platforms and data analysis are breaking functional siloes and barriers across the construction and design industries. While I’ve covered several technologies and scenarios already it can be daunting for companies to know where they should begin.

The first step for McKinstry has been to provide access to the data that we already have, namely to BIM and 3D models typically siloed within the engineering and detailing departments. Model collaboration and visualization tools allow the project team to examine the model in a more detailed and interactive way that drives deeper overall project understanding.

For non-model-based data, creating easy-to-digest visualizations for our project teams, who don’t have time to deep dive into large data sets, has been a key step. Data visualizations provide quick access, highlight potential risks, and allow the teams to make informed decisions within busy on-site project schedules.

While your path may vary, the positive outcomes are almost guaranteed. Advancing software platforms and the rise of data analytics is the push our industry needs to move forward.